IT company director ordered to personally rectify almost $150,000 in deliberate underpayments
Fair Work Ombudsman secured $35,308 penalty against IT company director who deliberately underpaid 16 workers. Director personally ordered to pay back nearly $150,000 in compensation.
$35,308 penalty plus almost $150,000 in personal compensation ordered against IT company director for underpaying 16 workers
Can I be personally liable if my company underpays workers?
Relevant to all trade business owners as it shows personal liability for wage underpayments. Directors can be held personally responsible beyond company penalties.
Key takeaways
- Company director ordered to personally pay back nearly $150,000 to 16 underpaid workers.
- Fair Work can pursue personal penalties against directors for deliberate wage underpayments.
- Director received $35,308 penalty on top of the compensation order.
- Case demonstrates personal liability extends beyond the company for wage breaches.
Related
Fines rise after dodgy job ads spruik below-minimum rates
Fines for job ads offering below-minimum wage rates have risen 18% in the past year. Repeat or serious offenders face potential court action from regulators.
Why it matters: Affects all trade employers including builders, plumbers and electricians who post job ads. Illegal wage rates in ads can now trigger fines or court action.
Melbourne plumber allegedly paid migrant worker no wages for a year of work
Fair Work Ombudsman has launched legal action against a Melbourne plumber accused of paying a migrant worker nothing for a year of work, withholding over $35,000 in wages and falsifying records.
Why it matters: Plumbers and all trade business owners must comply with Fair Work laws. Underpaying workers, especially migrants, can result in serious legal action and penalties.
FWC's Clerks Award WFH decision is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist
The HIA welcomes FWC's rejection of a mandated WFH right but criticises the new WFH clause added to the Clerks Award as unnecessary. HIA says the clause addresses a problem that doesn't exist in the industry.
Why it matters: Builders and construction firms employing office/admin staff under the Clerks Award may face new WFH obligations. Could affect how admin roles are managed day-to-day.