Melbourne painting and restorations company in court
The Fair Work Ombudsman has launched legal action against a Melbourne painting and restorations company and its director over alleged breaches affecting an adult apprentice.
Why is a Melbourne painting company being taken to court by Fair Work?
Trades employers must ensure apprentice pay and conditions meet legal requirements or risk FWO prosecution.
Key takeaways
- Fair Work Ombudsman has launched legal action against a northern Melbourne painting and restorations company.
- The company director is also named in the legal proceedings.
- The alleged breach relates to how an adult apprentice was treated.
- The case involves workplace law violations in the painting and restorations sector.
Related
Fair Work Ombudsman and Border Force target South-East Queensland in joint inspections
The Fair Work Ombudsman and Australian Border Force conducted surprise inspections of around 40 businesses across Brisbane, Sunshine Coast and Moreton Bay. The joint operation targeted potential wage and worker compliance issues in South-East Queensland.
Why it matters: Builders, electricians, plumbers and other tradies in SEQ should ensure worker entitlements and visa compliance are in order. Snap inspections can result in penalties.
Melbourne transport company allegedly failed to pay unfair dismissal compensation
The Fair Work Ombudsman has launched legal action against a Melbourne transport firm and its director for allegedly ignoring a Fair Work Commission order to pay unfair dismissal compensation.
Why it matters: Affects all trade business owners in VIC. Ignoring Fair Work Commission orders can trigger FWO legal action, adding serious legal and financial risk.
IT company director ordered to personally rectify almost $150,000 in deliberate underpayments
Fair Work Ombudsman secured $35,308 penalty against IT company director who deliberately underpaid 16 workers. Director personally ordered to pay back nearly $150,000 in compensation.
Why it matters: Relevant to all trade business owners as it shows personal liability for wage underpayments. Directors can be held personally responsible beyond company penalties.